An illustration of the hypothesis proposed in the dissertation on the origin and composition of our three first canonical gospels. With a preface and an appendix, containing miscellaneous matters. The whole being a rejoinder to the anonymous author of theRemarks on Michaelis and his commentator

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
An illustration of the hypothesis proposed in ...
Herbert Marsh
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by WorkBot
July 23, 2010 | History

An illustration of the hypothesis proposed in the dissertation on the origin and composition of our three first canonical gospels. With a preface and an appendix, containing miscellaneous matters. The whole being a rejoinder to the anonymous author of theRemarks on Michaelis and his commentator

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Buy this book

Book Details


Edition Notes

A reply to John Randolph's "Remarks on "Michaelis's Introduction to the New Testament : vols. III, IV, translated by the Rev. Herbert Marsh, and augmented with notes."

Published in
Cambridge

The Physical Object

Pagination
xxi, [3], 128, 79, [1]p. ;
Number of pages
128

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL18717000M

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
July 23, 2010 Edited by WorkBot add editions to new work
October 19, 2008 Created by ImportBot Imported from Talis MARC record.